This study is part of a greater piece of research toward group relations and you may related perceptions on other public organizations. Most of the users have been examined just after providing the agree in writing. Respondents was indeed hoping privacy to complete some paper-and-pen forms on ATLG actions actually. Volunteers acquired a lot more borrowing products because of their way degree. The brand new ethical criteria of Chilean Look Commission (CONICYT) was in fact implemented.

As well, governmental mind-categorization (asking regarding the political choice coded toward three groups: leftover, heart and you will right) and you can sexual orientation was integrated

Players responded demographic inquiries to check on ATLG legitimacy: gender, age, socioeconomic condition (higher, middle and low levels were used), and faith identification compliment of thinking-revealing towards cure for issue “You think your self a spiritual person?” At exactly the same time, a good cuatro-product size scale on the good six-section Likert scale concerning your strengths users give to its spiritual records within their every day existence was utilized.

It was developed in Northern America. ATLG is measured on a 6-point Likert scale. The instrument was translated and adapted (Cardenas Barrientos, 2008) (see the Appendix). The ATLG Spanish language version in this study had not been used with Chilean populations before. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94 for ATLG; 0.88 for ATL; and 0.91 for ATG (The ATLG and the two subscales demonstrated good internal consistence for this sample. The correlation for the two subscales is high (r ₍₅₀₃₎ = 0.84; p < 0.001). ATLG overall mean was 3.52 (SD = 0.75).

Higher (close to 6) results presented higher prejudice, and you may reduced results stated good perceptions on homosexuals

Part of the mission were to influence the underlying ATLG factor build. Very, around three factor patterns was in fact projected: a single-basis design (ATLG consists of an individual homophobia cause for and therefore all affairs saturate); a-two-grounds synchronised design (a few size constructed because of the ATL and you can ATG subscales whoever items dans votre 40s rencontres que des revues would be to saturate in the related foundation are proposed) another acquisition design which have a few correlated circumstances (in which ATG subscale products manage saturate in 2 size – homosexual Beliefs and you can Nature – and those of the ATL level create saturate from the other three – lesbian Antique Beliefs, and you may Societal Approve and you can Societal Liberties). These four proportions had been taken from analyses carried out in prior training (Cardenas Barrientos, 2008).

Typically, the fresh new complement is perfect whenever model activities is actually increased. Therefore, the 2-factor second-order model is one of parsimonious for everybody indexes acquired. CFI (Comparative Improve List) and you will NFI (Normal Complement Index) spiders inform you philosophy over 0.9, all of them considered decent (Bentler Dudgeon, 1996). RFI (Cousin Enhance Directory) value techniques 0.9, particularly in the five-foundation model. While doing so, RMSEA (Resources Mean square Mistake out of Approximation) list is tall with philosophy lower than 0.08 (Browne Kudeck, 1993), for this reason confirming an informed match of your own five-factor model.

Table 3 also shows the factor saturations for each of the five sub-scales model items. All standardized saturations were significant (p < 0.001). All of the 20 items of the standardized solution loaded on the general grouping factor in the expected direction. The relation between the five latent factors is as follows (covariance): the dimension Social Rights has a high positive correlation with the factor Nature (r = 0.6); moderate positive with both Social Rights (r = 0.43) and Social Sanction (r = 0.038); and high positive with Traditional Values (r = 0.74). The dimension Nature is moderately and positively correlated with Social Rights (r = 0.32) and Social Sanction (r = 0.35), but highly and positively correlated with Traditional Values (r = 0.61). The relation of the dimension Social Rights with Social Sanction (r = 0.31) and Traditional Values (r = 0.37) is moderate high. Finally, the relation between Traditional Values and Social Sanction is moderate positive (r = 0.43).